PCAPPC

The 1957 Belvedere they pulled out of a time capsule Friday in Tulsa looks like it found the nuclear war they put it there to avoid. It would've been better off in somebody's car port. You'd think that with 3000 years of experience preserving the dead for the afterlife and the hundreds of years we've had to learn what conditions were necessary for the artifacts we've uncovered to have been preserved for a thousand or more years, that the civic boosters in Tulsa could've have found an archivist more qualified than the engineer who designed the zip-lock bag, and a solution less ridiculous than a concrete vault under a foot of dirt and grass saturated year-round by rain and automated sprinklers. It's symbolic of America's legacy, a glimpse into the history books of the future and what the United States of America is going to look like to schoolchildren years, centuries, millennia (should we be so lucky) hence: arrogant, ignorant and wasteful; or, more like...

"Blue Moon: The earliest known recorded usage was in 1528, in a pamphlet entitled Rede Me and Be Not Wrothe: “Yf they say the mone is belewe / We must beleve that it is true” [If they say the moon is blue, we must believe that it is true]." ― Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_moon belewe, blue / beleve, believe It appears to me that the poet was doing a little word-play on two words that in the 16th century must’ve sounded very much (if not exactly) alike. Because spelling hadn’t been standardized at the time, writing was generally phonetic. I wonder if the derivation of the “blue” in blue moon is a mistranslation of “believe” and has to do with the credulity of the event – a second full moon in a single month, or a fourth full moon in a season. “Beloved” and “believe” are naturally related, and the full moon is universally associated with young love and discreet sexual encounters. A beloved moon is a blue moon. Lief in Dutch is love in English, and lief surviv...

From the KUOW Weekday archives: The Press: Blundering or Notable? "Did the press fail to hold the administration accountable in the run up to the Iraq war? Some believe the media parroted the administration's scripted spin on the issues. Is that accurate? Does the need for "official sources" cripple journalistic enterprise? And if the press failed to hold powers accountable then, is their coverage better now? Is there more tough investigative reporting occurring when it comes to the Gonzales scandal or the Hurricane Katrina aftermath? W. Lance Bennett is professor of political science and the Ruddick C. Lawrence Professor of Communication at the University of Washington. His recent book, which he wrote with Regina Lawrence and Steven Livingston, is When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina." Related Links: 'Buying the War,' Bill Moyer's Journal 'Iraq Three Years Later: The Path to War,' NPR's Morning E...

The debut program of Bill Moyers' Journal, Buying the War , is 90 minutes well-spent. Watch it, and watch it again.